In December 2019, Natural Justice and its partners launched the African Environmental Defenders Fund. Initially, this fund targeted African members of the International Land Coalition (ILC) who faced threats and harassment due to their work as environmental defenders. In 2021, Natural Justice and its partners expanded the initial fund, with the result that we can now provide emergency funding to a wider array of environmental defenders. This includes any land and environmental defenders across Africa who are facing an emergency due to their activism.
Partners to the fund include the International Land Coalition, ICCA Consortium, Pan-African Climate Justice Activists (PACJA), Oxfam Novib, FEMNET, and African Youth Commission.
What has changed?
The fund is now open to non-ILC members.
The fund can, in certain circumstances, fund security infrastructure measures.
The latest eligibility criteria now reads:
Any person is eligible to apply for an emergency grant if they meet all of the following criteria:
Is a citizen of any African country or a person legally residing or working in any African country;
Is an active frontline land and environmental rights defender working on issues related to land rights, environmental and climate justice, including but not limited to rights over natural resources, land or environmental conflicts, land grabbing and land reform;
Is facing an imminent threat or harm due to the nature of his/her work as a land and environmental defender; AND
Has not secured any other kind of support from another entity, organization or person to support him/her through the emergency situation.
What the fund can cover includes:
Expenses related to the installation of security infrastructure in exceptional circumstances: The Fund can cover an application to procure security infrastructure such as CCTV cameras provided that adequate justification is given on how this will help overcome the emergency situation. This may include reference from a tech specialist on the effectiveness of such infrastructure.
Kenya, 16 July 2021: Today, we speak as environmentalists, conservationists, civil society organizations and advocates of the earth to demand action from our leaders, starting with the President of Kenya, the Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI), the Kenya Forestry Service and the Ministry of Environment and Forestry, to thoroughly investigate the murder of Joannah Stutchbury. This Kenyan Environmental Defender was killed on 15 July 2021, at around 16h35 (EAT) just outside her home. Kenyan authorities must ensure that the killers, who dared to murder her in broad daylight, face the full force of the law.
The preamble of our Constitution states that we are “Respectful of the environment which is our heritage, and determined to sustain it for the benefit of future generations”. Article 42 guarantees all Kenyans the right to a clean and healthy environment.
Unless environmental defenders are effectively protected, we will be forced to continue to attend their burial ceremonies. Their only crime was to stand and protect the Constitution that we dearly love.
Crimes against the environment are the fourth largest criminal enterprise – only drugs, counterfeiting, and human trafficking beats it. Environmental crimes (experts prefer the term ecocide) ranks higher than the sales of illegal arms. Threats to active environmental protectors have claimed the lives of the courageous ivory investigator, Esmond Bradley Martin, Esther Mwikali, Sengwer Robert Kiprotich, and forced Phyllis Omido and other environmental defenders into hiding recently.
We are alarmed at the rate at which human rights activists, environmentalists, and conservationists are threatened, harassed and killed each day in Kenya and worldwide. At the same time, the perpetrators continue to scour the country free from any repercussions.
Joannah was a dedicated and committed conservationist and an ambassador of the forest who never turned a blind eye when she saw illegalities within the Kiambu forest. We believe this is the reason why she was killed.
We are fully cognizant and applaud the President, His Excellency Uhuru Kenyatta, for condemning this act of cowardice from the perpetrators. Indeed, they saw no other way to silence our beloved Joannah – who made bold statements favouring the environment, including protecting our forests – but by killing her.
For this reason, we, as organizations from all parts of the country, the African region, and the world, condemn this senseless killing and call for justice for Joannah and all the other environmental and human rights activists who have lost their lives while defending the integrity of our environment and natural heritage. These fierce and courageous defenders have met their untimely death while trying to leave behind a better world for the next generation, for being the voices and guardians of the trees in the forests that give us the oxygen that we breathe and the wildlife that attracts billions of shillings as foreign currency from the tourists that visit this nation.
Protecting our environment, wetlands, and forests is not optional. It is a precondition for the survival of Kenya.
It is for all the above reasons that we demand:
Ensure the DCI takes this matter seriously and proper investigations are done.
Direct the Ministry of Environment and Forestry, as well as the Kenya Forestry Service, to come up with a plan of protecting and, where appropriate, gazetting all forest lands in Kenya to shield them from land grabbers who see the forests as opportunities to enrich themselves at the expense of our environment and all Kenyans.
Nurture, protect and enhance the capacity of forest-dwelling and indigenous communities, like the Ogiek and Sengwer, to defend and protect our forests, lakes, and rivers.
To direct, with immediate effect, environmental activists’ to stop being labelled as anti-development, nay-sayers, disruptors, or a nuisance.
The Directorate of Criminal Investigation
To thoroughly investigate Joannah’s murder and not leave any stone unturned in their pursuit of the perpetrators. Further, to make public their status report within 14 days henceforth (by 30th July 2021)
To prosecute the perpetrators, including their agents and accomplices, of this cowardly and heinous act and ensure that justice is met.
The Ministry of Environment and Forestry
Coordinate with other relevant ministries and government departments to ensure our environment and forests are not afterthoughts whenever any decisions (be it development projects or otherwise) are made.
Work with environment activists, conservationists, forest-dwelling, and indigenous communities to reach a grassroots – grass tops solution to protect our environment, forests, rivers, and swamps from land grabbers.
On 15 September 2020, five Batwa men who had been detained in prison in Bukavu in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) since August 2019 were released and are all, at long last, back home with their families. This is thanks to the tireless work of Forest Peoples Programme’s (FPP) partner, Centre d’Accompagnement des Autochtones Pygmées et Minoritaires Vulnérables (CAMV) and the legal team they have been working with in Bukavu, with the financial support provided by the African Environmental Defenders Emergency Fund.
The five men, arrested in February and October last year, and imprisoned without trial, were accused of the illegal possession of weapons and the participation in a militia (Raiya Mutomboki). This was in the context of Kahuzi-Biega National Park (KBNP) responding very aggressively to the return of Batwa communities to their ancestral lands. These Batwa had been evicted from their ancestral lands to make way for the Park. Some community members, tired of years of patient but utterly frustrating negotiations to try to return to the land, had finally returned.
Historical background of the Batwa struggle
The Batwa people living beside KBNP have spent the last 45 years demanding justice for the forcible expulsion of their community from their ancestral lands. In 1975, they were expelled from land where they had lived for centuries to make way for an extension of the Park. They were pushed into dwellings in the border areas of the park. In the subsequent years, they have become impoverished, losing significant cultural and linguistic heritage that was bound up in their traditional practices. They have been dispossessed by an approach to conservation that assumes that communities and the preservation of biodiversity are incompatible.
In recent years, the tension between the Congolese Institute for the Conservation of Nature (ICCN) and Park authorities on the one hand, and indigenous communities on the other, has escalated. Attempts by Batwa community members to peacefully regain lands in the park, or at least access to traditional resources such as natural medicines, have resulted in dramatic incidents. There has been an estimated ten deaths of Batwa community members over recent years.
Since 2014, several attempts at negotiation have failed. Park officials and the ICCN continue to demonstrate little commitment to dialogue or peaceful resolution of the conflict. Three different “dialogues”, including the Whakatane Dialogue, have been held between members of Batwa communities and ICCN, but none of these have resulted in significant changes to the Batwa’s circumstances.
In October 2018, a group of Batwa men moved into the Park to make a stand and reclaim their rights to the land. Deprived of any means of subsistence, these Batwa had no choice but to return to the Park. Unfortunately, the Batwa’s incursion into the Park was met with violence by the Park administration. The ICCN accused the Batwa of destroying the Park’s ecosystem. Some Batwa leaders were threatened by the security services, others (including women) were arrested and given very heavy jail sentences. In the aftermath, there were several confrontations between eco-guards and indigenous communities. At least ten Batwa were killed and several eco-guards also killed or injured during those clashes. It has become a vicious circle.
It is under these circumstances that six members of the Batwa indigenous community in Kahuzi-Biega (South Kivu) in the Democratic Republic of Congo were arrested in February and October 2019, respectively. One of them, Yonas Muderhwa, died in prison on 25 July 2019.
Legal support and humanitarian assistance to the Batwa
In June 2020, an application was made by FPP on behalf of the CAMV to the African Environmental Defenders Fund for funding for legal assistance for the Batwa members. The Defenders Fund responded to the lack of effective pro bono services in the judicial system. Three Batwa men arrested in February 2019, and sentenced to 5 years on 20 March 2020 for participation in a militia, appealed against the judgment. But, because of the lack of legal assistance, their case was never heard before the Court of Appeal.
In DRC, you need to make the necessary “diligences” so that your case can be settled before a tribunal or court. It means that the defendants needed to pay for a lawyer themselves, which was unaffordable for them. As a result, the three Batwa men remained in jail for more than a year until the funds were accessed from the Defenders Fund.
FPP’s partner in Bukavu hired a law firm to assist the five Batwa before the judicial authorities, including the Tribunal militaire de Garnison (TMG) of Bukavu and the South Kivu Military Court. Two other Batwa men have been detained without trial since October 2019. They were prosecuted for illegal possession of weapons and ammunition. CAMV contracted local barristers in Bukavu to follow up on their case. As a result of this legal support, all charges were discharged and they were thankfully released on 10 September 2020.
Prison conditions are very precarious in Bukavu Central Prison. In most of the prisons in DRC, prisoners are abandoned to their sad fate. Cases of deaths are regularly reported in this prison due to the lack of adequate care. This was the case of Twa Yonas Muderhwa, imprisoned with the others in February 2019, who died in prison after five months on 25 July 2019. Fortunately, upon reception of the fund, CAMV was able to bring food and medicine to the five Batwa detainees in Bukavu central prison until their release.
Batwa leaders and their support organisation face further risks due to their role in defending land rights and environment
Recently, the management of Kahuzi-Biega National Park has published unfounded accusations that may incite violence and exacerbate threats against indigenous leaders and their support organisations, including FPP and CAMV. The official spokesperson of KBNP accused a prominent Batwa leader, Jean-Marie Kasula (whom FPP supports in another court case) of carrying out an armed attack on a convoy of vehicles, which included the provincial Minister of Agriculture. The article also suggests that CAMV and FPP could have provided the weapons for this attack. In the context of South Kivu, where instability and insecurity are, sadly, the norm, this kind of unsubstantiated public statement is incredibly dangerous. We fear for the safety of M. Kasula and his family and for the safety of our friends and colleagues at CAMV.
Traditional activities seen as a “threat” to conservation
The possibility for indigenous communities to exercise user rights, such as the collection of non-timber forest products, honey harvesting, and subsistence hunting have been affected by coercive law enforcement of PNKB administration. Added to that, the park administration often uses these minor infractions to spread conspiracies against certain community leaders. In the case of the five Batwa men, traditional hunting was exaggerated and categorised as a threat to state security and public order. They are still facing risks, because of their role within the community as leaders, but above all, because their family members are still settled in the Park.
Indigenous people across the world are finding themselves sidelined from decision-making about their land and livelihoods, pushed to the margins of their territories and criminalised for carrying out livelihoods activities they have done for thousands of years in the name of “conservation”. The creation of the Park has left the Batwa destitute and corroded their indigenous livelihoods. The criminalisation of their traditional activities, which lead to the detention of six Batwa community leaders and the death of one of the members, is unconscionable. The government of the DRC must take actions to tackle the issue of landlessness within the Batwa community and come to an agreement which will see them free to enter the Park to be able to hunt and gather.
In December 2019, Natural Justice, together with the International Land Coalition (ILC), launched the African Environmental Defenders Fund to support ILC-affiliated land and environmental defenders facing threats that place the defenders in a position where they require emergency support. The Fund is administered by a team within Natural Justice, as well as an external committee made up of five members. These committee members have regional experience and include a representative of an indigenous community.
The committee is tasked with considering the applications for emergency support. They assess whether the application meets the relevant criteria and will make a decision based on the evidence provided by the applicant. The committee’s target is to complete the decision-making process within 48 hours in order to be able to meet the emergency needs of the defender. The existence of the Fund is communicated via email, the website and social media channels.
Although it is only September, the Fund has been approached many times since March 2020, when we received our first application, and we can now report on the trends in the applications over the past six months and the outcomes of these. We are also now in a position where we will be seeking more funding to support African defenders.
The 2020 applications
Up until the 18 August 2020, we received a total of 15 applications from across Africa. Of the 15 applications, most were from Kenya. This is not unusual, as Natural Justice and the ILC have strong networks in the country and Kenya itself has witnessed many recent developments impacting on communities. For example, there have been evictions of Sengwer and Ogiek communities from indigenous forests over the last two months, instituted by the Kenya Forest Services, leading to significant threats, arrests and human rights violations.
Of the 15 applications, five were declined for two overarching reasons: in three cases, the defenders were not affiliated to an International Land Coalition member and neither were the defenders recommended for support by an ILC member. In the other two cases, there was no demonstration of an imminent threat to the defender and in one case, the defender had already secured assistance from others.
A key feature of some of the applications was that while some were applications on behalf of one defender and their family, others were for a collective of community members. Hence, even though we approved 10 applications, the Fund was able to assist a larger number of people.
Of the approved applications, the committee reviewed the amount applied for and the applicant was either awarded the whole amount or the amount was reduced. In the cases where the amount was reduced, reasons were provided. Some of the reductions were due to the fact that funding was requested for an activity that wasn’t urgent.
In total, the Fund has provided just over USD30 000 for the defenders.
Nature of threats to defenders
The nature of the threats to the applicant defenders are listed below. The threats are mostly physical, related to arrests, arbitrary detention and evictions, but some of the applicants faced digital threats, stalking and harassment.
Nature of threat faced
Arrest (and arbitrary detention)
Threat of arrest
Forced evictions, death threats and harassment
Attack and harassment
Forced eviction, assault, arrests, destruction of property and legal suits
Prosecution and illegal arrest
Stalking and digital tracking
Threats and attacks
Threats from unknown callers and strangers who visited and searched his home without a warrant
In order to ameliorate these emergency situations, the applicants requested funding for: legal representation, costs for bail, costs of relocation, costs of safe houses, and costs for day-to-day expenses while in hiding and unable to work. The most common of these, and the most funded request, was for fees for legal representation.
The way forward
Natural Justice has learnt extensively from this initiative, which has allowed us to provide immediate support to secure the life and freedom of defenders across Africa. Because environmental and land defenders play a crucial role in securing the future of the planet, the African Environmental Defenders Fund is crucial to securing activism and defense of nature. The initiative will both continue and expand in the future.
African defenders work, as well as the threats they face, are underreported worldwide. Through a number of coalitions, our community partners and through our own advocacy, we hope to be able to expose more of the atrocities against defenders and ensure that African defenders are counted within the data collection on defenders.
Natural Justice will be working to secure further funding, both for the ILC members, as well as for defenders who are not associated with the ILC. We will be looking at further ways of supporting defenders, through legal empowerment, advocacy, digital training and through the development of a network of African lawyers.
Each and every human being is born with fundamental rights. Yet, in many countries across the world, many of these rights do not exist on paper, or are eroded by governments and industries. For some people, like environmental and land defenders, failures to enact or uphold rights mean that their lives are threatened and their activism can put them in harm’s way.
According to the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), environmental defenders are people who take peaceful action, either voluntarily or professionally, to protect the environment and natural resources from over-exploitation. They are often ordinary people who have a passion to protect, conserve and speak up for nature, with hopes to reverse the damage done by a profit-driven, consumerist society.
There is a fallacy that exists that environmental defenders are against development. In contrast, they value the earth and are concerned that we are using unsustainable practices that are eroding nature to the point where the lives of our children and children’s children will be undermined. They fight to protect the natural environment for the health of all people and future generations!
Threats to environmental defenders
Because they speak truth to power, environmental and land defenders are the most targeted group of human rights defenders. The Global Witness report ‘’Defending Tomorrow: The climate crisis and threats against land and environmental defenders ‘’ released in July 2020, is chilling.
They state that, “Our annual report into the killings of land and environmental defenders in 2019 shows the highest number yet have been murdered in a single year. 212 land and environmental defenders were killed in 2019 – an average of more than four people a week.”
Attacks on defenders are widely documented in developing countries: namely the Philippines, Guatemala, Romania, Kazakhstan, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Uganda, Brazil and Ghana. At Natural Justice, we have also documented attacks in Kenya and Senegal, and know of attacks in South Africa. Unfortunately, conflicts, evictions and land grabbing in these countries, which often spur defenders into action, are expedited by corrupt government officials, organised crime, businesses and corporations, which are all very powerful entities.
Despite the good that environmental defenders do for our world, they are not being protected with the necessary assistance that they deserve. For example, the fight against the burning of the Amazon rainforest is led by local indigenous peoples, with little-to-no help from their government. They often fight alone against greedy companies and powerful people, putting their lives in grave danger.
Human rights that provide a space for defenders to work effectively
Those in power need to be questioned and held accountable for their actions. To do so, environmental defenders require a full array of rights to support their work. Knowing their rights and the frameworks within which they undertake their activism, can not only create a space for them to work effectively, but keep them out of harm’s way.
Below are human rights that would allow for environmental defenders to work effectively.
What is becoming increasingly recognised as a fundamental right is the right to a safe, clean and healthy environment. From this, we can guarantee other rights, like the right to water, food, health and life. UNEP states that 150 countries have this right in their constitutional frameworks and it is the basis for other rights, but can also be the basis from which defenders work – an empowering right that communities often cite in their struggles against polluters. Without this right, defenders may find litigation and advocacy more difficult.
The right to information allows defenders to be able to access information about activities on their land or territories and take part in public participation processes. They are also able to use that information to inform the public, their communities and their allies about the threats they face. With information, they are able to present the facts in court as evidence that their territory is threatened.
The right to freedom of thought, belief, conscience, religion, opinion and expression are important to defenders so that they may express themselves. They have the right to express their opinion, either vocally, in writing, in the form of art, or through any other media of their choice, at the local, regional, national and international levels.
The right to life is a constitutional right in some countries, which may protect defenders from the governments taking severe and lethal actions against them. In countries that are severely oppressive or authoritarian, this right is repeatedly infringed on, and defenders in these countries are at great risk of disappearing, being assassinated or facing capital punishment.
Closely associated with the right to life, is the principle of dignity, which requires governments and their entities, businesses, corporations and anyone else to respect the integrity and dignity of defenders, to not discriminate against them and to treat defenders fairly. It is the moral foundation for all other rights and freedoms.
Freedom from arbitrary arrest or detainment means that, should a defender be arrested for their activities, they must be arrested according to a specified and fair process. Closely tied to this is the right to access to justice, including the right to have access to free legal representation facilitated by the State where a defender is accused of committing a crime. The latter right also includes the right to a fair hearing.
Theright to fair administrative action speaks to instances where frivolous law suits are brought against defenders – most notorious are the strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP) suits. Most of the time, the decision to prosecute the defender is not necessarily because they did what they are accused of doing, but as a result of abuse of power by the government or industry bringing the law suit. In South Africa, a well-known SLAPP suit was brought to intimidate activists and lawyers, who were accused of defamation. This right also facilitates a fair process of defenders who might file complaints against government entities or corporations about human rights abuses, and for these complaints to be taken seriously by the relevant bodies.
The right to protest or freedom of assembly plays a significant role in the civil, political, economic, social and cultural life of all societies. Protests have repeatedly encouraged positive social change and the progression of human rights, and they help to guard our shared spaces in all parts of the world.
The right to movement advocates for the state to take appropriate measures to facilitate the freedom of movement of people working in rural areas. Without the right to movement, defenders are unable to mobilise their communities, spread information or, if needed flee a source of danger.
There are less traditional rights that are becoming more widely recognised in legal spaces, such as the right to internet. The right to internet is becoming more recognised as it allows for defenders working in rural or far flung places to be connected to international advocacy spaces. It helps to promote rights like that of freedom of expression and the right to protest and right to information. Increasingly, having access to technology and internet access is seen as an important aspect of defenders’ ability to do their activism.
Closely linked to this and other rights, is the right to privacy, which provides for defenders’ work, identity, family and associates to be able to act without arbitrary or unlawful surveillance or oversight from government or corporations. It provides for defenders to work with freedom both physically and within the online space. It provides that their correspondence is not unlawfully intercepted and it ensures that the are not threatened or harassed.
Land rights are vital to protecting indigenous people and local communities. Having secure land rights, whether individual or collective, means securing their lives and livelihoods now and for future generations. It is also central in protecting our climate, as it provides for maintaining forests and other lands which are important for our planet’s health. If there is no legal recognition, our unprotected lands, like the forests, are more likely to be degraded.
Indigenous rights (and rights to cultural or religious freedom) are important as they recognise the right to protect someone’s cultural practices which are usually linked to the land and various cultural resources. Everyone has their own culture, and deserves to practice it. Defenders are often indigenous people who are not only protecting nature, but their way of life and identity. Another aspect of indigenous rights is that the UN, through the UN Declaration on the Rights of Peasants and Other People Working in Rural Areas, encourages states to provide this legal recognition and protection of indigenous people and their resources.
It is important to recognise that women defenders have unique needs related to threats associated with gender-based violence. The right to equality is especially important to women environmental defenders, as well as rights that protect them from rape, harassment and sexual assault.
All of these rights, as well as others, exist to make it conducive for defenders to do their work. Human rights are the basic rights and freedoms that belong to every person in the world, from birth until death. We must respect and uphold the rights of indigenous peoples and local communities, or else they exist merely on paper. Gratefully, over the past few decades, and increasingly so now, people worldwide have begun to stand with them and support their work and their rights. We need to listen to the voices of environmental defenders and help to strengthen them.
Between 7 and 10 July 2020, the Kenya Forest Services launched coordinated evictions to remove the Sengwer and Ogiek communities from their ancestral lands in the Embobut and Mau forests respectively. This occurred despite the existence of a moratorium by the Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Interior and Coordination of National Government halting all forced evictions during the coronavirus pandemic period.
The evictions also ignored an earlier statement by the United Nations Special Rapporteurs on adequate housing and the situation of human rights defenders, calling upon the government to stop all evictions during the pandemic period and protect human rights defenders working with evictees.
The evictions in Mau and Embobut were preceded by earlier evictions in the Kariobangi and Ruai regions in Nairobi. Evictees were granted only 24 hours’ notice of the planned evictions and human rights defenders were threatened with ‘forced disappearances’.
In 2018, environmental defenders who are members of Save Lamu, a community organisation opposed to the construction of the Lamu Coal Plant, where arrested on false charges of belonging to a terrorist group and harassed by government forces.
This situation is similar to that faced by environment and land defenders advocating against unsafe salt mining in Magarini sub-county in Kilifi County. The situations in Mau, Embobut, Kairobangi, Ruai and along the Coast have become a norm in Kenya. Human rights and environmental defenders are harassed by the police and communities’ right to housing and a clean environment rest on the mercies of the government.
Kenya’s legal framework supporting defenders
From the scenarios, one may assume that Kenya lacks laws stipulating the rights and protection of environmental defenders. In actual fact, chapter four of the Constitution provides protection for fundamental rights and freedoms, including the right to a clean and healthy environment, right to freedom and security of person, freedom of expression, right to privacy, right to assembly and rights of arrested and detained persons.
Other laws which offer protection to defenders include the Prevention of Torture Act No. 12 of 2017, the Access to Information Act No. 31 of 2016, the Independent Policing Oversight Authority Act No. 35 of 2011, the Defamation Act, Cap 36, the Witness Protection Act, No. 16 of 2006 and the Fair Administrative Action Act No. 4 of 2015.
In addition, institutions such as the Independent Policing Oversight Authority and the Kenya National Human Rights Commission, as well as other human rights organisations, have been at the forefront of investigating and calling for the prosecution of perpetrators of human rights abuses.
Nevertheless, more needs to be done to recognise the vital role played by environmental defenders in fighting against illegal acquisition of land, calling out state and non-state projects which cause harm to the environment, acting as watchdogs over state agencies, ensuring the implementation of environmentally-sound policies and zealously protecting the right to a clean and healthy environment.
This role is not only threatened by the police force, Kenya Forest Service and non-compliant project proponents, but also by unconstitutional laws and decisions. The Public Order (Amendment) Bill, 2019 is one such potentially unconstitutional law. The Bill proposes penalising organisers of public meetings or processions by requiring them to provide compensation for loss of life or damage to property occasioned by participants.
If passed, the Bill will infringe on the right to peaceful assembly. It will provide an unjustifiable limitation beyond the scope of Article 24 of the Constitution. In addition, the Bill does not take into consideration the realities of public meetings or processions which include the invasion of a lawful assembly by persons who are against it.
The High Court has also rendered conflicting judgments on the right of human rights defenders to assemble. The case of Ngunjiri Wambugu v Inspector General of Police & 2 others  eKLR, sets damning precedence by proposing demarcation of demonstration zones, maximum numbers of demonstrators, consent of persons/entities adjacent to demonstration zones and penalties against protestors. The decision limits enjoyment of the right to assembly and is contrary to the Public Order Act Cap 56 and an earlier case of Ferdinand Ndung’u Waititu & 4 others v Attorney General & 12 others  eKLR. In this case, the Court affirmed the right of organisers of public meetings to choose an appropriate public venue and use public streets and public areas for such meetings.
Kenya is yet to honour its obligations under the Constitution, as well as those found in regional and international conventions* it has ratified. This laxity has led to condemnation by the UN on Kenya’s human rights obligations. In a press release from 22 May 2020, UN special rapporteurs strongly condemned harassment of a human rights defender and noted that the ‘government has the obligation to guarantee Ms. Mumbi’s protection from such a threat [of forced disappearance], whether it comes from public officials or third parties acting with the acquiescence or knowledge of the State’.
On 23 July 2020, Community Land Action Now (CLAN) issued a press statementcondemning recent evictions of the Ogiek and Sengwer. The press release, supported by 153 organisations across the globe, called for a halt to forced evictions and harassment of these communities and called for respect for the rule of law.
For the Government, there is need for targeted implementation of rights and freedoms in the Constitution. This includes ensuring constitutionality of laws adopted to regulate exercise of rights, compliance of actions of government agencies and corporations with environmental regulations, efficient investigation and prosecution of perpetrators of human rights abuses, promotion of civic education meetings on proposed projects and allowing communities to participate actively and efficiently in meetings, ensuring compliance with court orders and the evaluation of government policies which limit fundamental rights.
The judiciary also has a role to play in adopting constitutionally sound decisions on the rights of environmental defenders and by making rulings against vexatious cases instituted by the police.
* Kenya has ratified the Universal Declaration on Human Rights 10 December 1948, 217 A (III), the International Convention on Civil and Political Rights 16 December 1966, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 999, p. 171, the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights 27 June 1981, CAB/LEG/67/3 rev. 5, 21 I.L.M. 58 (1982), the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 16 December 1966, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 993, p. 3 and the Convention against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment 10 December 1984, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 1465, p. 85.
On International Human Rights Day, Natural Justice and the International Land Coalition present African Environmental Defenders: https://envirodefenders.africa/
This past weekend, the Guardian reported on the latest assassinations of indigenous environmental defenders; this time, two indigenous leaders were killed in a driveby shooting in Brazil. Every week the media is reporting on the deaths, harassment and intimidation of environmental defenders throughout the world and it is becoming more dangerous for those who live in and defend their territories from states and companies seeking to extract their resources.
African Environmental Defenders play an important role in protecting their lands and ecosystems from unsustainable industrial development, logging and extractive projects. However, the nature of their work can expose them to significant risks because of the political and monetary powers they stand up against.
Having worked with African communities for over eleven years, Natural Justice understands what is at stake and is committed to supporting African Environmental Defenders. Together with the International Land Coalition, we will be administering a fund to support environmental and land defenders who find themselves in emergency situations due to the nature of their work.
The funding is currently for those who are members of the International Land Coalition only, but future funds may be made available to those who are not connected to the ILC but meet the criteria of African Environmental Defenders.
And so, today on International Human Rights Day, we are proud to launch the website, African Environmental Defenders – a resource that can help to support African environmental defenders who are at the frontlines of defending their territories.
Natural Justice, the International Land Coalition and our partners will be contributing and growing this resource into the future. We are proud to be part of something so crucial to African communities and environmental defenders.
Share this GIF on your social media to help us promote the launch of this new resource.
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.